Polynomial Rings - Units, Nilpotents and Zero divisors
Polynomial Rings - Units, Nilpotents and Zero divisors
M.Velrajan
Let R be a commutative ring with identity and R[x] be the ring of polynomials in
an indeterminate x, with coefficients in R. We find necessary and sufficient
conditions for a polynomial in x over R to be a unit, a nilpotent element and
a zero divisor of the ring of polynomials R[x]. And we prove that
the nilradical of R[x] = the Jacobson radical of R[x].
Throughout R denotes a commutative ring with identity.
First we prove the property of nilpotent elements of R.
1. Let a be a nilpotent element in R. Then 1 + a is a unit in R.
And in general, the sum of a unit and a nilpotent element is a unit.
Proof Since a is a nilpotent element in R, an = 0 for some integer n > 0.
To prove 1 + a is a unit, we have to find y such that (1 + a)y = 1 using an = 0.
Think!! What is the relation between 1 + a, an and 1.
Yes, the simple algebraic relation . . .
(1 + a) (1 - a + a2 - ∙ ∙ ∙ + (-1)n - 1an - 1) = 1 + (-1)n - 1an = 1 + 0 = 1.
Hence 1 + a is a unit in R.
Suppose u is a unit in R.
Suppose u is a unit and a is a nilpotent in R.
To prove u + a is a unit, we can use 1 + a is a unit if a is nilpotent.
So express u + a in terms of 1 + b.
Yes, u + a = u(1 + u - 1a). Is u - 1a nilpotent ?
Then, since the set of all nilpotents in R is an ideal of R,
u - 1a is a nilpotent element in R.
Hence 1 + u - 1a is a unit in R.
Since the product of two units is a unit, u + a = u(1 + u - 1a) is a unit in R.
2. Units of R[x]
Let f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anxn ∈ R[x].
Suppose f is a unit in R[x].
Then there exists b0 + b1x + b2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + bmxm ∈ R[x] such that
(a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anxn )(b0 + b1x + b2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + bmxm) = 1.
i.e. a0b0 + (a0b1 + a1b0)x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + (a0br + a1br-1 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + arb0)xr + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anbmxn + m = 1,
where ai = 0 for all i > n and bj = 0 for all j > m.
Hence a0b0 = 1 i.e. a0 is a unit in R.
And a0br + a1br-1 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + arb0 = 0 for all r = 1, 2, ∙ ∙ ∙ , n + m,
where ai = 0 for all i > n and bj = 0 for all j > m. — (A)
Taking r = n + m in (A), anbm = 0.
We use this with the coefficient of xn+m-1.
Taking r = n + m - 1in (A) and multiplying both sides with an ,
(an - 1bm + anbm - 1)an = 0an = 0
i.e. an - 1bman + an2 bm - 1 = 0
i.e. an2 bm - 1 = 0.
Power of an increased by 1 and the suffix of b decreased by 1.
Taking r = n + m - 2 in (A) and multiplying both sides with an2 ,
(an - 2bm + an - 1bm - 1 + anbm - 2)an2 = 0an2 = 0
i.e. an - 2bman2 + an - 1bm - 1an2 + an3 bm - 2 = 0
i.e. an3 bm - 2 = 0.
Proceeding thus, we get an4 bm - 3 = 0 = an5 bm - 4 = ∙ ∙ ∙ = anm + 1 b0.
Combine this with a0b0 = 1
anm + 1 b0 = 0 ⇒ anm + 1 b0a0 = 0a0
⇒ anm + 1 = 0 (since a0b0 = 1)
⇒ an is a nilpotent element in R.
Hence an is a nilpotent element in R[x].
Since – xn is in R[x] and the set of all nilpotents in R[x] is an ideal,
– anxn is a nilpotent element in R[x].
Since sum of a unit and a nilpotent element is a unit,
f – anxn is a unit in R[x].
i.e. a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an - 1xn - 1 is a unit in R[x].
Proceeding thus, we get an - 1 is a nilpotent element in R and
a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an - 2xn - 2 is a unit in R[x];
an - 2 is a nilpotent element in R and
a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an - 3xn - 3 is a unit in R[x];
∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ;
a1 is a nilpotent element in R.
Hence
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a unit in R[x] ⇒ a0 is a unit and a1, a2, . . . , an are
nilpotent elements in R.
Conversely, suppose a0 is a unit, a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R and
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn.
Then a0 is a unit and a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R[x].
Since the set of all nilpotents elements in R[x] is an ideal,
a1x, a2x2, ∙ ∙ ∙ , an xn are nilpotent elements in R[x] and hence
a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x].
Since a0 is a unit in R[x], f = a0 + (a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn) is a unit in R[x].
Therefore,
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a unit in R[x] ⟺ a0 is a unit and a1, a2, . . . , an
are nilpotent elements in R.
3. Nilpotents of R[x]
Suppose f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x].
We know the units of R[x], so use the property of nilpotents.
Then 1 + f = (1 + a0) + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a unit in R[x].
Hence a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R and hence a1x, a2x2, ∙ ∙ ∙ , an xn are
nilpotent elements in R[x] and a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x].
So a0 = f - (a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn) is a nilpotent element in R[x].
i.e. a0 is a nilpotent element in R.
Hence f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x]
⇒ a0, a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R.
Conversely, suppose a0, a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R and
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn.
Then a0, a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R[x].
Since the set of all nilpotents elements in R[x] is an ideal,
a0, a1x, a2x2, ∙ ∙ ∙ , an xn are nilpotent elements in R[x] and
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x].
Therefore,
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a nilpotent element in R[x] ⟺ a0, a1, a2, . . . , an
are nilpotent elements in R.
4. Zero Divisors of R[x]
Suppose f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a zero divisor in R[x].
Then there exists g ≠ 0 in R[x] such that fg = 0.
Choose a polynomial g = b0 + b1x + b2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + bmxm of least degree m such that
fg = (a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn)(b0 + b1x + b2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + bmxm) = 0.
Then a0b0 + (a0b1 + a1b0)x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + (a0br + a1br-1 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + arb0)xr + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anbmxn + m = 0,
where ai = 0 for all i > n and bj = 0 for all j > m.
Hence a0br + a1br-1 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + arb0 = 0 for all r = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n + m. — (A)
Taking r = n + m in (A), anbm = 0.
Hence ang = anb0 + anb1x + anb2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anbm - 1xm - 1 is a polynomial of
degree m - 1 and f(ang) = anfg = an0 = 0.
Therefore, by the choice of g, ang = 0.
Claim : aig = 0, for all i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n.
Suppose it is proved that ang = 0, an - 1g = 0, . . . , an - kg = 0.
Then, taking r = m + n - k +1, in (A),
a0bm + n - k + 1 + a1bm + n - k + ∙ ∙ ∙ + am + n - k + 1b0 = 0
an - k-1bm + an - kbm -1 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + anbm-k-1 = 0
Since ang = 0, an - 1g = 0, . . . and an - kg = 0,
anbm-k-1 = 0, an - 1bm -k = 0, ∙ ∙ ∙ , an - kbm -1 = 0. Hence an - k-1bm = 0.
Hence an - k - 1g = an - k - 1b0 + an - k - 1b1x + an - k - 1b2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an - k - 1bm - 1xm - 1 is a
polynomial of degree m - 1 and f(an - k - 1g) = an - k - 1fg = an - k - 10 = 0.
Therefore, by the choice of g, an - k - 1g = 0.
Hence, by proceeding thus, aig = 0, for all i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n and hence the claim.
Therefore, aibj = 0, for all i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n and j = 0, 1, 2, . . . , m.
Since g ≠ 0, there exists at least one j such that bj ≠ 0.
Let a = bj ≠ 0. Then aia = 0, for all i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n and hence af = 0.
Conversely, suppose there exists a ≠ 0 ∈ R such that af = 0 then, since a ≠ 0 ∈ R[x],
f is a zero divisor in R[x].
Therefore,
f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a zero divisor in R[x]
⟺ there exists a ≠ 0 ∈ R such that af = 0.
⟺ there exists a ≠ 0 ∈ R such that aa0 = aa1 = aa2 = ∙ ∙ ∙ = aan = 0.
4.1. R[x] has non zero zero divisors ⟺ R has non zero zero divisors.
i.e. R[x] is an integral domain ⟺ R is an integral domain.
5. Suppose the ring R has no nonzero nilpotents. Then, by 2.and 3.,
i) only the units of R are the units of R[x].
ii) R[x] has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
5.1. Suppose the ring R has a nonzero nilpotent. Then, by 2.and 3.,
i) There are infinite numbers of units of R[x] (irrespective of whether R has a finite
number of units or infinite number of units).
ii) R[x] has infinite numbers of nonzero nilpotent elements and hence infinite
numbers of nonzero zero divisors.
6. Suppose the ring R is an integral domain. Then R has no nonzero zero divisors.
Since any nonzero nilpotent is a nonzero zero divisor, R has no nonzero nilpotents.
Hence, by 5.,
i) only the units of R are the units of R[x].
ii) R[x] has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
And by 4.1.,
iii) R[x] has no nonzero zero divisors and hence R[x] is an integral domain.
7. If F is a field then F is an integral domain. Hence, by 6.,
i) only the units of F(i.e. the nonzero elements of F) are the units of F[x].
Hence F[x] is not a field.
ii) F[x] has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
iii) F[x] has no nonzero zero divisors and hence F[x] is an integral domain.
8. Recall :
The ideal of all the nilpotent elements of R is called the nilradical of R.
And the nilradical of R is the intersection of all prime ideals of R.
The intersection of all maximal ideals of R is called the Jacobson radical of R.
We denote the nilradical of R by 𝕹 and the Jacobson radical of R by 𝕽.
Since any maximal ideal of R is a prime ideal of R, 𝕹 ⊆ 𝕽.
In general 𝕹 ≠ 𝕽. But,
9. In the polynomial ring R[x], 𝕹 = 𝕽.
Proof We have to prove 𝕽 ⊆ 𝕹.
Let f = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn ∈ 𝕽, the Jacobson radical of R[x].
Then 1 - fg is a unit in R[x], for all g ∈ R[x].
(since in a ring R, a ∈ 𝕽 ⟺ 1- ab is a unit in R, for all b ∈ R)
Hence 1 + fx = 1 - f(-x) is a unit in R[x].
i.e. 1 + a0x + a1x2 + a2x3 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn+1 is a unit in R[x].
Hence, by 2., a0, a1, a2, . . . , an are nilpotent elements in R and hence, by 3.,
f is a nilpotent element in R[x]. i.e. f ∈ 𝕹, the nilradical of R[x].
Hence 𝕽 ⊆ 𝕹.
But in general 𝕹 ⊆ 𝕽.
Therefore, 𝕹 = 𝕽 in R[x].
Without examples, learning is incomplete.
10. i) In the ring ℤ4 of integers modulo 4 only 1 and 3 are the units.
Since 22 = 0 only 2 is the nonzero nilpotent and nonzero zero divisor of ℤ4.
Hence
{a0 + a1x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn / n ≥ 0, a0 ∈ {1, 3} and ai ∈ {0, 2}, i = 1, . . . , n}
is the group GL1ℤ4[x] (or ℤ4[x]× ) of all units of ℤ4[x].
And {a0 + a1x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn / n ≥ 0, ai ∈ {0, 2}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n}
is both the nilradical and the set of all zero divisors of ℤ4[x].
ii) In the ring ℤ6 of integers modulo 6 only 1 and 5 are the units.
ℤ6 has no nonzero nilpotents. And 2, 3 and 4 are nonzero zero divisors of ℤ6.
In fact 2.3 = 0 = 3.4 and 2.4 = 2.
Hence only 1 and 5 are the units of ℤ6[x].
And ℤ6[x] has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
If n ≥ 0 and ai ∈ {0, 2, 4}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n and at least one ai ≠ 0 then
a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a non zero zero divisor of ℤ6 (since 3.2 = 0 = 3.4).
And if n ≥ 0 and ai ∈ {0, 3}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n and at least one ai ≠ 0 then
a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is a non zero zero divisor of ℤ6.
But if n ≥ 0 and ai ∈ {0, 2, 3}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n and at least one ai ≠ 0 and if ai = 2
and aj = 3 for at least one i ≠ j then a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is not a zero divisor
of ℤ6(since there is no a ≠ 0 ∈ ℤ6 such that a.2 = 0 and a.3 = 0).
Also if n ≥ 0 and ai ∈ {0, 3, 4}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n and at least one ai ≠ 0 and if ai = 3
and aj = 4 for at least one i ≠ j then a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn is not a zero divisor
of ℤ6(since there is no a ≠ 0 ∈ ℤ6 such that a.3 = 0 and a.4 = 0).
In particular, 2 + 3x is not a zero divisor of ℤ6 and
3 + 4x is not a zero divisor of ℤ6.
See how examples enlighten the understanding of the theory.
iii) In the ring ℤ8 of integers modulo 8 only 1, 3, 5 and 7 are the units.
Since 23 = 0, 42 = 0, 63 = 0, 2, 4 and 6 are the nonzero nilpotents of ℤ8.
And hence 2, 4 and 6 are nonzero zero divisors of ℤ8.
Also 2.4 = 0 = 4.4 = 6.4.
Hence
{a0 + a1x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn / n ≥ 0, a0 ∈ {1, 3, 5, 7} and ai ∈ {0, 2, 4, 6}, i = 1, . . . , n}
is the group GL1ℤ8[x] (or ℤ8[x]× ) of all units of ℤ8[x].
And {a0 + a1x + ∙ ∙ ∙ + an xn / n ≥ 0, ai ∈ {0, 2, 4, 6}, i = 0, 1, . . . , n}
is both the nilradical and the set of all zero divisors of ℤ8[x].
iv) ℤ is an integral domain and only 1 and -1 are the units of ℤ.
Hence only 1 and -1 are the units of ℤ[x]. And ℤ[x] has no nonzero nilpotent
elements. Also ℤ[x] is an integral domain.
So Learners :
Understand, Think Mathematically, Raise questions, Try to get answers.
This will make your learning Enjoyable.
Comments
Post a Comment